IPhone 4S comes with iOS 5, the world’s most advanced mobile operating system, which includes over 200 new features including Notification Center, an innovative way to easily view and manage notifications in one place without interruption and iMessage™, a new messaging service that lets you easily send text messages, photos and videos between all iOS 5 users. iMessage on OS X came later.įrom the press release (. When iMessage was released, it was done so as covenience feature for Apple users on iOS (so iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch) to communicate with other Apple users. > Apple is trying to put a fence around is not something that it should be legal for them to in the first place I'm sorry for pilling on more poor analogies. Happy to accept that criticism, it's fair. Your analogy doesn't make sense because what Apple is trying to put a fence around is not something that it should be legal for them to in the first place I think we've seen about 15 years of tech companies trying to assert various kinds of control up to and including ownership over people's social graphs in order to lock them in to various services, and that it's clear some regulation is necessary to prevent this kind of play. This is a confusing choice, and most users don't even know the technical details, but the end result of it is that they might have extremely mixed information about how secure their text messages are, especially if they don't know in advance what kind of phone the other person has Apple phones will send E2E iMessages by default to other Apple phones, and insecure SMS to non-Apple phones, and just shows this to you as "messages." This service only indicates this difference in connection status through a color change When someone exchanges phone numbers with a friend, you might not even know what kind of phone they have. So in this analogy, to be clear, the product that apple is supposedly selling access to here is "Sending secure messages to your friends" But considering that many folks with Android phones might also have Mac laptops or subscribe to Apple Music, it doesn’t seem impossible that Apple could allow for interoperability across devices and clients and that lawmakers could encourage this. I’m not saying using a third-party client needs to be completely free - paying Apple in either attention or money makes some sense. Amortized across a global base, running a chat network is barely $1/year/user for the average case is what I’ve seen before on HN. And it’s been said before that the cost to Apple is minimal if you exclude the lock-in effect. We’ve allowed third-party ecosystems to develop elsewhere before. We would also like to express our sincere gratitude to all of you out there supporting us! We will continue to work hard and pursue the necessary avenues to keep this a reality. > Going forward, Cerulean Studios is committed to maintaining interoperability across all major IM networks. As they note back in 2002: “ Fixed AOL Connectivity Bug: Yes, again and again and again.” It’s not that different from any third-party client though.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |